In another thread, at least two posters opined that the exposure of Angel's Landing was more bothersome to them than the exposure of Half Dome (the cables).
I am curious about both exposure and other difficulty on the final 400 of the Mountaineer's Route as compared to other places.
For those of you who have experience with the applicable places, how would you compare the exposure of the Mountaineer's Route with Angel's Landing?
And how would you compare the difficulty (independent of the exposure) between those two places?
I would also be interested to hear from anyone who has climbed both the Mountaineer's Route and the Summit Trail of Camelback Mountain in Phoenix. (The Summit Trail starts from the west and goes up 1,200 feet in 1.2 miles.) I was surprised at the arm and leg workout I got and am curious as to if that isn't similar to the Mountaineer's Route.
(Absent the exposure, aren't all 3 places mentioned basically Class 2, and more or less the same in difficulty in that respect?)
